Conn. 2010 School Pesticide Ban: Decade-Long Impact Study
The first installment of the series explores how school districts have adapted their lawn care and maintenance practices in the absence of synthetic pesticides. It highlights the challenges and successes encountered in maintaining safe and playable athletic fields and green spaces. Many schools have adopted organic and integrated pest management strategies, but varying budgets and resource availability have led to uneven results across districts.
The second article delves into the environmental implications of the ban. Researchers and environmental advocates note reduced pesticide runoff into local waterways, contributing to healthier ecosystems. However, some experts argue that alternative maintenance methods, such as increased fertilization and aeration, have introduced new ecological considerations.
The third and final piece in the series focuses on the public health effects of the legislation. With children being particularly vulnerable to pesticide exposure, the ban aimed to protect students from potential health risks. While the long-term health benefits are still being studied, early indications suggest a reduction in exposure-related concerns, reinforcing the precautionary approach that led to the ban’s passage.
This series sheds light on both the successes and challenges of Connecticut’s pioneering pesticide ban and serves as a case study for other states considering similar legislation. As discussions around environmental and public health policies continue to evolve, Connecticut’s experience provides valuable insights for policymakers, educators, and environmental advocates nationwide.
According to the author, “Our study brought together research and extension professionals from the fields of turfgrass (J. Henderson), sustainable landscapes (V. Wallace), economics (B. Campbell), and One Health (S. Tomis) to explore the ten-year impacts of the Connecticut school pesticide ban as perceived by the school grounds manager. This study followed an earlier series conducted shortly after the enactment of the school pesticide legislation. Understanding long-term changes to management, quality, and transitions to synthetic turf can aid in informing salient research and outreach initiatives to better serve school grounds managers and their communities.”
Dr. Wallace is a Senior Extension Educator at the University of Connecticut Sustainable Turf & Landscape Program focused toward turf and landscape professionals in the state. She is involved with IPM education and outreach programs for landscape professionals and municipal turf and grounds managers. She also is involved with the evaluation of low maintenance turf grasses and the evaluation and efficacy of minimum risk weed management products.
The full article can be found on the ASHS HortTechnology electronic journal website at:
https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH05587-24 and https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH05588-24 and
https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH05589-24
Established in 1903, the American Society for Horticultural Science is recognized around the world as one of the most respected and influential professional societies for horticultural scientists. ASHS is committed to promoting and encouraging national and international interest in scientific research and education in all branches of horticulture.
Comprised of thousands of members worldwide, ASHS represents a broad cross-section of the horticultural community – scientists, educators, students, landscape and turf managers, government, extension agents and industry professionals. ASHS members focus on practices and problems in horticulture: breeding, propagation, production and management, harvesting, handling and storage, processing, marketing and use of horticultural plants and products. To learn more, visit ashs.org.
https://ashs.org/news/news.asp?id=704000